Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Be cautious, wait for signals

Published: Sunday, February 6, 2011

Updated: Sunday, February 6, 2011 15:02

Growing up, our parents always tell us to look both ways before we cross the street. Why does that cautious advice seem to escape us after our elementary school years?

Last Thursday, a female was hit by a car and injured while crossing Gemini Boulevard by the Recreation and Wellness Center.

Although there is a crosswalk located at that intersection, the woman did not wait until she had the right-of-way to cross.

The woman was conscious at the scene and taken to the hospital. The woman's name and condition have not yet been released.

It's sad what happened to the woman and we hope for a full recovery, but at the same time we can't say we're surprised.

It's far too often that we see pedestrians entering the street when the stoplight is red either because they're not paying attention or he or she too impatient to wait a few extra seconds for the light to change.

Although walking against the light may seem like a petty offense, it can be extremely dangerous — as the incident last week proves.

Just because the way looks clear doesn't mean you should cross against the light.

Orlando is known for its traffic and bad drivers and you really shouldn't assume that if a car does approach while you're illegally in the intersection that the driver will see you in enough time to stop.

As a pedestrian you need to be much more vigilant to traffic rules because you are harder to see and because if a car hits you, you'll fair a lot worse than the car and driver.

We're lucky enough at UCF to have a condensed campus that makes walking to class safe and easy with only a few areas where students have to cross any major traffic — one being by the Recreation and Wellness Center and the another being by the Arena.

Some people have commented on the Future's article about the accident saying that UCF should build pedestrian bridges over that intersection. But we really don't think that's the answer.

UCF already has enough projects underway and with recent budget cuts, adding something like this doesn't seem feasible, especially considering it's really not necessary.

If you're in such a rush that you can't wait at the crosswalk, then leave ten minutes earlier. And really, pay more attention. When you're crossing or waiting to cross, put down your cell phone and your iPod until you're safely on the other side of the road.

As strange as this statistic sounds, 1,000 pedestrians had to go to the emergency room in 2008 because they were paying too much attention to their cell phones and not enough attention to their path, according to a study done by Ohio State University.

Sgt. Troy Williamson of the UCF Police Department told the Future that many students are distracted by electronic devices and that in light of this incident, the UCF PD will pay more attention to pedestrians crossing at busy intersections and start handing out more tickets for violating traffic laws.

We're in college now. Students need to take more responsibility for their life and pay attention to traffic.

It's almost pathetic that the university is being forced to take extra precautionary measures because students are too distracted or hurried to cross at the proper time.

The crosswalk light is there for our safety. Obey it and you won't have any problems.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments

Anonymous
Tue Feb 15 2011 16:50
I agree that people need to be more cautious when crossing the streets around campus. But, before you post your stories, you need to get the entire story. The young lady hit was someone with special needs. She is the kind of girl who will make sure everyone looks both ways before crossing the street. So please don't assume that she was on her cell phone, not paying attention, etc. She probably crossed with another group who was illegaly crossing, not realising the light hadn't actually changed. She probably was lagging behind as the group rushed across. So I'd appreciate it if you didn't jump to such conclusions with your stories. Thank you.
Anonymous
Mon Feb 7 2011 13:35
that would cost too much money to be practical. have you ever been to a downtown? Downtown cities don't have bridges at every intersection. They expect their citizens to be smart enough to not walk when a car is coming.
Lightning Knight
Mon Feb 7 2011 12:49
Read this in the paper- and I think the opinions in this paper are fair, and well written as always, but falling far short of the mark on this particular issue.

No doubt there is NO excuse for people not looking both ways and paying attention to the lights before crossing the street. However the paper seems to glance over something many have suggested which deserves a in-depth look. The idea that UCF should seriously consider adding bridges.

I understand that you are of the thought that if people payed attention like we expect them too , that they are not necessary- but this is a ticking time bomb, and worse than Thursday's accident.

Obey it and you won't have any problems, works assuming we can totally solve this alone through common sense. The problem is that unfortunately we are missing the target a lot with that blanket statement.
First off- that person hit wasn't a UCF student, correct? We will always have people who don't go here, from just about anywhere- who might ignore the rules. We'll always have people crossing who have lived in areas where this isn't enforced. We WILL have increasing amounts of traffic, and "impatient" students, irregardless of how many tickets and signs we put out.

In multiple spots around this campus- the streets aren���t that friendly to cross. UCF is not inherently pedestrian friendly- except in the inner 2 circles.
We���re approaching 60,000 students- and that���s going to keep rising- meanwhile, we already know for a fact the Rec center by itself is the most popular spot on campus. We have painfully known that- UCF traffic is getting worse(they had to add lights to every single intersection recently).Crosswalks , and modernizing UCF intersections(adding tunnels or crosswalks, and so on) would not only solve all these problems, it���d make it easier on drivers as well.
Ppeople should do the right thing, and I find it sad and very dissapointing cops have to ticket more-but just because you or I can tell people to obey the rules- or a cop can start mass citing people for jaywalking-will not be too efficient against a rapidly increasing population of people in general who are impatient against cars that are impatient. We can do even better to ensure this never happens again. And there's no excuse for not taking this THAT seriously.

I end with this-
Tickets and signs will never solve the massive problem of people ignoring cars moving in general(garages or streets),stupidity(people not paying attention will always exist, even with tickets), the horrible traffic, and so on.

And people will unfortunately have their lives at risk. That is what is truly unacceptable- and thus we should do what would actually guarantee reducing that risk.
Bridges WOULD solve the safety problem, the traffic congestion problem and the impatience problem. And UCF would have more advanced intersections where accidents like this would be virtually ZERO.

Budget cuts? Yea, we know. however- Lives take priority. Period. Especially if we're serious about having a safe campus. Add in increased efficiency, car wise and people wise- and if we keep doing that across campus- it starts to pay for itself- JUST like UCF's decision to add traffic lights to every intersection will.

Colin
Sun Feb 6 2011 17:14
How about "Be cautious, but don't wait for the little man to tell you when to walk when there are no cars in sight"?
It always amuses me how many people do not know how to cross streets. If the coast is clear, go for it. If not, wait.




log out