College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Bonuses come at a bad time

Published: Sunday, July 25, 2010

Updated: Sunday, July 25, 2010 15:07

How would you spend $143,085.01? Would you buy a house? A car? An education?

Still not sure? Well, why don’t you ask President John Hitt for some ideas.

On Thursday, the Orlando Sentinel published an article that made us want to vomit.
Hitt, along with other administrators, will be receiving thousands of dollars in bonuses based on performance.

The bonuses were postponed from last year because of, you guessed it, the economy.

Just when you thought a decent thing was done when they accepted pay cuts, little did you know this was just a temporary delay in receiving big, fat bonuses.

According to the article, “The one-time payouts, which range from about $12,000 for Helen Donegan, vice president for community relations, to about $143,000 for Hitt, were based on meeting specific performance goals that were different for each administrator but could include enrollment growth.”

So, basically, you get a bonus for bringing more students to UCF, and then increase their tuition and parking fees, and then somehow manage to sleep soundly at night on top of a pile of money? Since when does doing your job entitle you to obscene amounts of money, anyway?

The article also said, “At the same time, belt-tightening has led to layoffs and program closings at UCF and other state universities. Currently, about 1,400 faculty and professional staff members are awaiting word on proposed 1 percent salary increases and one-time bonuses of $1,500 for some, according to faculty union leaders.”

Yeah, we can’t let you know if your salary’s going to go up to $30,300 or not, sorry. In the mean time though, we’ll accept a nearly half million dollar pay rise and drive off into the sunset in a gold Mercedes.

The gold Mercedes may have been an exaggeration, but you get our drift. Besides, buying a gold Mercedes would be ridiculous when, for $143,000 you could buy about four non-gold ones.

The Sentinel discussed how the bonuses were accepted now instead of later in order to avoid having them accumulate high interest, which would possibly do something like raise our tuition more.

Sounds like a self-serving, sketchy reason to us.

Why not hold off on the bonuses and reinvest the interest in the school, athletics or parking garages, or put the bonuses into professor salaries?

Even if the bonuses were part of a contract or have been turned down the past couple years because of the poor economy, these bonuses will never be justified to students.

Seeing programs slashed, having our tuition increased, and waking up every day wondering if our degree will even mean anything with the way unemployment is right now makes it hurt all the more to see the administration get more money.

Hitt has done a lot for UCF and has made it better in many ways (once again, this is essentially his job) with the medical school, making us a “green school” and everything else.

But in a time like this, his actions aren’t worth that kind of money.

To put that amount in perspective, that $143,000 is what LeBron James made for every 20.1 points scored last season.

For that money, you could buy 242,516 tacos from Del Taco, about four for every student.

Heck, Hitt could give each student at UCF $2.67. We wouldn’t complain.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

Anonymous
Tue Aug 3 2010 17:28
You realize the cost of living has gone down in the past few years where the economy is decling, right?
Anonymous
Wed Jul 28 2010 15:33
It looks bad due to timing.

If you are going to give a public employee a 10 percent (or more) bonus, then you need to give similar raises to some or all of the other employees. It is a fundamental fairness issue.

There are employees at UCF that work as hard or harder than those top administrators that are getting hardly squat the last 5 years and are falling behind in cost of living significantly.

Anonymous
Mon Jul 26 2010 21:47
No on is arguing that Hitt and other top administrators do not deserve a raise, as they certainly do make UCF better. However, what other staff have a problem with is the fact that we haven't received a raise in three years and are only being thrown a "bone" with a measly 1% raise. That's not even enough to be considered a cost of living increase!
Anonymous
Mon Jul 26 2010 11:25
This opinion is poorly informed. These bonuses come from a combination of money earmarked by the state for administrative pay and donations from the UCF Foundation. As usual, though, the Future takes a chance to complain about Hitt's salary, despite the fact that the money could not have been spent in any of the ways suggested. Although you may not see it, Hitt and the rest of the top-level administrators at UCF do a lot to make this school great and they deserve to be paid for it, perhaps especially in hard economic times. After all, short of cutting some academic fat, UCF has avoided layoffs, furlows, and paycuts seen at other state universities thanks to Hitt's and Hickey's careful financial planning and building of reserves to help us through just this kind of situation.
Anonymous
Sun Jul 25 2010 21:39
The pay raises for these people are ridiculous, but they do it every year, all the time. Not uncommon for double digit pay raises for senior UCF leadership.

They thought they could get it by this year since they gave a 1 percent raise this year to staff who hasn't had a raise in 3 years.







log out