Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Democrats have the stronger deficit plan

College Democrat

Published: Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Updated: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 16:07

Our country's national debt stands at a startling $14.5 trillion – and politicians from both sides of the isle have provided their own answers to reducing the deficit and getting our fiscal house in order. However, the bulk of these proposals are rooted in ideology and political self-interest – not what is right for the American people.

The College Democrats at UCF believe that public servants are elected to serve this nation, not their own political ambitions. The only solution to cutting the deficit will stem from a shared sacrifice – both sides coming to a compromise and making bold and difficult decisions. This includes cuts to spending, increasing revenue, yet still investing in the future.

We must first dispel the myth that government spending "kills" jobs. Alan Blinder of the Wall Street Journal says it best – noting the absurdity of the Republican proposal that cutting funding for public workers will actually create more jobs. Yes, inefficient projects and programs may need to be reformed, but because they are inefficient, not because they are "killing jobs." Our economy is still in a fragile state and investments in the American people are an integral part in achieving a full recovery from the 2009 recession. The same article cites the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office as estimating the stimulus package created at least 1.3 million new jobs in 2010 and perhaps as many as 3.3 million; that doesn't sound like "job-killing" to me. Yet despite that, we still have high levels of unemployment.

So we have quite a challenge before us: a weak economy and a massive deficit. Therefore, we must find balanced solutions that include a shared sacrifice to ensure our government lives within its means, and our economy can continue to grow. We need to cut defense spending and wars abroad; according to the Congressional Budget Office, defense spending comprises an unsustainable 20 percent of our national budget. We may also face reforms to entitlement spending, but we cannot reduce the deficit on the backs of the elderly, poor and disabled. They carry a heavy enough burden; they're facing unemployment and having to pay the taxes of the wealthiest of Americans. And that's the next step: raising revenue.

Throughout this entire debate, the Republican Party has defended tax breaks for companies making record profits, and advocated the cut and removal of programs crucial to the firefighters, teachers and students. We need to remove tax loopholes for the wealthiest Americans and take a balanced approach toward taxes that call on the wealthiest Americans and special interests to pay their share. Even President Ronald Reagan knew when to raise taxes; according to CBS News, he did so 11 times. We cannot expect to pay off the deficit without increasing government revenue and we certainly cannot ask our firefighters, teachers and the rest of the middle class to pay the taxes not paid by the wealthiest of Americans.

As College Democrats, we don't see a problem – we see solutions. In every challenge, there is an opportunity to move this country forward. The Republicans have chosen to "gamble our country's good name" as The Economist puts it, essentially holding our nation's economy hostage. Rather than be bold and serve their constituents, they are using our country's fate as a political tool. We need to make tough decisions and substantially reduce this deficit. That means cuts to spending, reforms to crucial social programs, raising revenue through the removal of tax loopholes and an increase in taxes for the wealthiest of Americans.

We find ourselves in an extraordinary dilemma. We have a weak economy and a massive deficit. But the College Democrats at UCF refuse to allow the middle class and the hardest-working Americans to carry the burden of this deficit. As a people, we must all make a shared sacrifice. Only then can we keep moving forward.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

18 comments

Fred
Sun Aug 7 2011 15:13
"As far as I know, horses don't speak English. I don't think she understood me."

I really think you're stupid enough not to realize how much you're embarrassing yourself with these comments.

Anonymous
Sat Aug 6 2011 21:29
As far as I know, horses don't speak English. I don't think she understood me.
@Samson
Fri Aug 5 2011 15:39
What's with the personal attacks? If you disagree with her opinion then say why you disagree with it. I happen to disagree with her stance on this issue also, but I don't go around calling her names. Constructive criticism is constructive, name calling is not.
Samson
Fri Aug 5 2011 10:13
This woman has a horseface.
Konstantin
Sun Jul 31 2011 13:57
You're all acting like children. I've decided to make this comment under my name so that at least someone in this debate could show some sign of accountability and responsibility. The fact that the future is actually publishing two subjective view of the story without giving an objective overview of the situation shows just how low we've sunk.

You rely on skewed statistics that favor your position and repudiate the dynamic implications of those statistics to favor your partisan viewpoint, a vicarious replication of the politicians you support. The comments I have seen on these political forums are absurd, naive, childish and inflammatory. I find it rather entertaining that an opinion article sites another opinion article as fact.

If there was ever a time to reevaluate how we approach debate and dialogue, our "student leaders" (I say that with minimal reverence) are a testament to how our country has arrived at this destination.

Your approaches are static, repetitive and not as innocuous as you may believe, they are the catalyst of our stagnating nation, and the decline of deductive reasoning

Anonymous
Sat Jul 30 2011 16:03
If you haven't seen a plan yet than you clearly don't pay attention to politics as they just passed a Democrat plan yesterday, idiot
Anonymous
Fri Jul 29 2011 22:59
So what is their plan? I haven't seen anything yet. Other than spend the country into more and more debt with free money for anyone how asks for it.

You have to have a plan written and submitted for a vote to Congress before you can really say there is a plan. Keep in mind, the Democrats are now approaching 900 days since they last voted to approve a budget.

Anonymous
Thu Jul 28 2011 19:52
Hey! Sarah Jessica Parker got a tan and dyed her hair!
Michael T.
Thu Jul 28 2011 15:25
UCF Econ 08: I love how because you can't counter my point you immediately go into ad hominem and straw man attack mode, as the usual Republican tact. I have no idea what unions and the NLRB have to do with the current debt ceiling negotiation except in your sad, mixed up Republican mind. As for how the government can create jobs: any legitimate economist can tell you that stimulating demand through government spending and tax cuts for the middle class (which President Obama has frequently called for) will incentivize businesses to create jobs to meet that demand. Also you're right about the comparison between Bush and Perry being incorrect, Perry would be much worse then Bush was because Bush himself has said publicly that he couldn't stand Perry and his reactionary ideology when Perry was his Lt. Governor.
UCF Econ 08
Thu Jul 28 2011 13:30
First glad, you can know my tv watching habits... To keep it simple, I watch MSNBC for fifteen minutes per day at any given hour and pretty much guarantee that I will hear the same nonsense repeated elsewhere from sad examples of people attempting to sound informed later. If I went through all the details that the Republican article put up there it would overwhelm your simplier grasp of reality. Read it again and slowly highlight the specifics that have figures and actual CBO reports and other primary sources linked to them. Secondly, you never addressed his point that Obama himself at a much smaller debt actually ripped the President and Congress for what he is now falsely claiming is necessary to avoid doomsday for our economy. Real economists know that they only thing that will happen August 2, is that President Obama will be two days short of his birthday, his third in office, and still be without a budget passed or anything substantial accomplished that has not harmed the economy through uncertainity, contradictory aims and weak appeasement of the radical base of his party. Just look at what he has allowed the National Labor Relations Board to attempt to do to the good people of South Carolina, most of which who will be employed by the efforts of Boeing will be minortiies, by attacking Boeing's attempt to freely exercise their rights to conduct legal business in the United States. Sure Obama has no chance of winning SC, but does it really necessitate him attacking SC to protect union jobs in a swing state like Washington? Same nonsense different angle. It is a continued pattern of disregard for real growth in business and instead focusing on real growth for the power brokers who made him President... Rick Perry is clearly not George Bush. Your simple attempt to lump those two very different individuals together either shows a bit of racism against white people from Texas or maybe just hate on Texas itself. Rather than the fact of what in the last 10 years he has actually accomplished. Base your arguements on facts and not emotional ties and you will actually accomplish something in life. That will always be the difference between Republicans and Democrats in the US. One bases their stances on what actually works now and in the long run, the other is hedonistic and focuses only on short term pleasure and satisfaction, no matter what it costs in the long term. Please if you are going to waste time responding provide an example of how you think the government is going create real jobs while we suffocate the private sector not only taxing it increasingly but choking out the credit markets from investing in real progress.
Anonymous
Thu Jul 28 2011 13:20
Hey apparently UCF Econ 08 thinks you're cute Ida
Michael T.
Thu Jul 28 2011 12:14
UCF Econ 08: You can say that her arguments are ripped from MSNBC (which they are not, and clearly you have never watched MSNBC if you think they are) but then I can equally say that the other article's arguments are ripped straight from Fox News. The difference between the two is that Ida's article actually gives specific ideas that will help solve our debt crisis while the other only speaks in vague generalities and gives no specific realistic plan to solve the crisis. Also the American people will never elect another reactionary-conservative governor from Texas again as we are still suffering from, and trying to fix, the destruction caused by the last one.
UCF Econ 08
Thu Jul 28 2011 11:58
At least for the Republican's side of the aisle... We know that we are not stuck on an island... The Republicans give only a glimpse of what is a complicated solution to a difficult challenge and are not trying to simplify it down to talking points and slogans like your democrat regurgitation. You look cute in your dorm room photo, but the arguments and conclusions are ripped straight off MSNBC and require very little in actually digestion or discernment as to what is the proper course. If you want the real solutions go to the people who actually have had to make difficult decisions in the real world. Business is what we need to grow and running this country with a bunch of politicians who could not even balance their own checkbooks or keep certain parts of the private life off twitter will only get us what Obama has brought despite his promises. Ask yourself this, are you really better off now that hope and change has been the pillars of our foreign, domestic and total economic policy? Lets get some substance. Bring in the Texas governor who has a balanced budget, growing economy and is not afraid to upset people on both sides of the political divide.
Michael T.
Thu Jul 28 2011 11:20
"Anonymous" your ignorance is showing because first of all this is the OPINION section of the CFF so of course she is giving an OPINION in this article, second the College Republicans and College Democrats both have an article on the debt ceiling debates in this CFF edition and yet you didn't complain about bias on that article's comment thread. So stop trolling unless you're going to do it correctly, seriously.
Anonymous
Thu Jul 28 2011 10:58
Wow. A member of the college democrats saying that the democrats have a better plan? It's amazing how unbiased this girl is.
Michael T,
Thu Jul 28 2011 10:25
But she does consider it "Anonymous" when she says: "We need to cut defense spending and wars abroad; according to the Congressional Budget Office, defense spending comprises an unsustainable 20 percent of our national budget."
Anonymous
Thu Jul 28 2011 09:45
A "balanced approach" that doesn't even consider the ending 3 imperial wars we are involved in...lol
Michael T.
Thu Jul 28 2011 01:15
Great article Ida! Thank you for laying out this reasonable, balanced approach solution the Democrats support that will help solve our nation's debt and unemployment problems.




log out