College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Fee has sponsor in Fla. Legislature

Money raised would go to green projects

Published: Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, November 18, 2009

The proposed Green Fee at UCF and other Florida universities has a new sponsor in the Florida Legislature.

House Rep. Robert Schenck, R-44, a UCF alumnus, has recently agreed to lead the bill through the House during next spring’s legislative session.

Schenck’s support comes after several weeks of student government efforts to find a representative willing to sponsor the bill in the House.

According to SGA Director of Governmental Affairs Stephen Mortellaro, UCF has been the statewide leader on the Green Fee issue since its conception.

“We have and will continue to use all the resources that we have at student government to ensure the passage of the Green Fee bill next spring,” he said.

UCF has been pushing for the Green Fee for three years.

The initiative was originally brought to students’ attention through a campaign led by the Eco-Advocates of Central Florida in the spring of 2007. Green Fees already existed at universities in other states, and SGA agreed to place the issue on that year’s student body presidential election ballot as a referendum.

The results indicated 67 percent of students supported the Green Fee. Other universities around the state followed suit with similar referendums, and all of those resulted in majority support for the measure, according to Mortellaro.

In order to turn student approval for the initiative into legislative reality, SGA partnered with Florida Sen. Lee Constantine, R-22, a UCF alumnus  whose district includes the main UCF campus. Constantine sponsored an amendment to Senate Bill 1996 concerning funding for UCF’s new medical school in this year’s spring legislative session. However, due to time constraints, it did not make it out of the Legislature.

For the next session, which will run from March to May of 2010, the Green Fee will no longer be presented in the form of an amendment but rather as a stand-alone bill.

“We are confident that with statewide student support and strong sponsors in the Florida Legislature, the Green Fee bill will pass this spring,” Mortellaro said. “It’s something that students want and something that will be beneficial to both the environment and the wallets of students and the university itself.”

Some may wonder how an extra fee will benefit their wallet, and Mortellaro has an answer.

“The purpose of the Green Fee is twofold: one is to lower the campus’ ecological footprint and the other is to save the university and students money by investing in renewable energy and energy-efficiency projects,” he said.

According to Mortellaro, energy costs are the university’s second-highest expense after personnel expenditures.

 If approved, the Green Fee would be overseen by a committee made up of students and administrative appointees in a 50-50 ratio.

The continuation of the Green Fee would also have to be reconfirmed by student referendum every three years after the initial approval referendum, which would take place after the bill is passed. The initial fee is planned to be around 75 cents per credit hour, with the max amount capped at one dollar. However, any changes to the fee must be confirmed by referendum.

For Mortellaro, the Green Fee is a win-win-win initiative. In his opinion, “the Green Fee bill reduces costs, improves the environment and empowers students.”

There is not bipartisan support for the bill among UCF’s political organizations, however.

“In a time when the costs of higher education are on the rise, I do not see this additional fee as wise or fair to students,” said Christina Aiuto, chairwoman of the UCF College Republicans. “The basic reason students pay for college is to receive an education that will lead to a career. We do not pay tuition in order to financially advance a noneducational endeavor — whether it be economic or charitable or environmental.”

She said the “green project” will make UCF more than $4 million every five years.

“Let it be a voluntary choice by the student to donate their money or not to renewable energy causes; the Green Fee is an unjustifiable tuition hike,” she said.

For Ross Harrison, president of the College Democrats at UCF, the Green Fee is a worthwhile endeavor.

“I completely support such a proposition,” he said. “It's students each paying a nominal fee into a pool of resources that will produce a collective good. It's something that students have been shown to support, and it's great that it may now be coming to fruition.”

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments

Amy Elliott
Mon Jan 11 2010 16:49
The detractors of this bill apparently do not realize that they are already paying more for energy every year, with no options for controlling those costs. And unlike the athletic fee and other fees which will only benefit small groups of students, the Green Fee will pay for campus-wide projects that will benefit everyone through cost savings. What the Green Fee will do is allow students to pool their resources to afford the renewable energy systems and energy efficiency projects that will cut their energy use or negotiate a fixed rate contract with a renewable energy company that will save much more money than what they initially have to invest for their energy systems.

Deutsche Bank has projected grid parity for solar in 5-8 years. Meaning that the price of solar energy is decreasing, while energy prices continue to increase. So from a business sense, energy efficiency measures to decrease energy use is a smart move as the return on initial investment will increase every year that energy costs increase. And from a competitive standpoint, the more Florida universities lead on renewable energy, the greater their reputation compared to other research and development universities.

Finally, from a political point of view I'm not buying the argument that energy conversation is a partisan issue. At a conference in St Pete on stimulus money programs, there were more Rubio bumper stickers in the parking lot than Obama stickers. So while it might be good political PR to bash renewable energy and energy efficiency legislation, in reality, there are many leading on this issue from both sides of the political aisle. When co-sponsors are lined up and the votes are counted we will see that both Democratic and Republican officials support this bill, and I applaud their efforts on this legislation.

Your name
Mon Nov 30 2009 19:40
Nice to see Aiuto making sense for once. Dem Love.
Your name
Sun Nov 22 2009 00:07
This fee is a load of crap. I should not be forced to pay for something that will not benefit me at all simply because the green movement wants it. UCF already has plenty of green projects around campus like the green roof, solar panels, green lights and waterless urinals. There is no need that my money go to pay for something that is already underway. There is a new group on Facebook, look up "Students Against the Florida Green Fee" the environmentalists have made it out to sound like we support this overwhelmingly. Join the group and show our representatives that this is not true!
slugwarz
Sat Nov 21 2009 22:51
I agree with Aiuto, let the fee be voluntary, and let those who really want UCF to be greener put THEIR OWN money where their mouth is instead of imposing on others. The select few can be so generous and well-intentioned with money they haven't sacrificed time, talent, and effort to earn...
liu
Sat Nov 21 2009 04:23
nike shoes airmax 03 sport shoes
www.tradertrade.com
Your name
Thu Nov 19 2009 23:39
Hey UCF. Here is a good idea. Stop making us buy custom books that we could buy online rather than getting one custom page of custom material for 170$ for a book I can pay 11$ for. And the 11$ book is a hardcover, so it lasts longer. My custom edition books are destroyed in less than a semester. Seems like we could save alot of trees like that.. Saving all those trees does seem very very green. Even greener than making us pay money to make green projects.. If we pay this green fee, will you pay someone alot of money to determine that custom edition books are a waste of paper and you could easily sell us the hard back editions that we can buy online? Here is a good idea. Why not charge as a carbon tax every time we drive into school. You could have a toll and charge us a "carbon pollution fee". Hey that may make 10 jobs if we have 10 people stand in a box all day to take tolls. Maybe, we should shut off the lights in every building for 15 mins every 2 hours. Maybe that would be greener. Ohh, lets forget learning, we should just learn to be green. Lets turn off the air conditioning and let us all be miserable. But its ok, we are being green. Maybe we should put peddles under the computers and let the students peddle to generate energy so they can surf facebook. That seems like it would teach us to be energy efficient. They charge us a e-learning fee for taking classes online, when it costs less and allows more students to take a class? Seems pretty green to sit at home and watch your lecture vs coming into class in a car. Please Please Do Not push fees on us. We cant even afford to buy books half the time and we get fees dumped on us? Do we look like we make money?






log out