Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Lack of gun ban is irresponsible

Published: Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Updated: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 13:05

It may be difficult for some people to pinpoint the most reckless decision Gov. Rick Scott has made during his tenure, but this one might be in the top three. Scott’s denial of a temporary gun ban at the Republican National Convention, which will be held in Tampa in August, is irresponsible and pointless. The ban was suggested by Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn in an effort to curb the potential for violence. Scott’s response? In a letter to Buckhorn, he argued that “it is unclear how disarming law-abiding citizens would better protect them from the dangers and threats posed by those who would flout the law,” according to the Associated Press.

Not only is Scott’s decision careless, but it is partisan and absolutely insulting to the residents of Tampa. Scott has shown a complete disregard for the stigma surrounding gun control by rejecting Buckhorn’s ban initiative. This stance sends the message that the crowd at the RNC will solely consist of “law-abiding citizens,” because to suggest otherwise simply doesn’t apply to the GOP. In reality, any political event, regardless of party affiliation, holds the potential for heated and overzealous interaction, which could lead to violent confrontation. It is absolutely ludicrous to think that attendees of the convention will be prohibited from bringing all other weapons and objects, including water guns but not real guns. With that being said, if firearms are taken out of the equation, what fatal harm could those who “flout the law” truly inflict on “law-abiding citizens” that would be worse than the alternative of no weapons whatsoever?

Second Amendment rights should not be misinterpreted on a state level to mean that anyone can carry a gun, anywhere, anytime. Recent cases like the shootings of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and Trayvon Martin and the incarceration of Marissa Alexander prove not only that this mindset begets serious consequences, but that also, in Florida, there is obviously substantial misinterpretation of the “stand your ground” law by the public and law enforcement. Scott’s refusal to acknowledge this ban only upholds this and propagates the trigger-happy ideology of gun lobbyists.

Ultimately, by allowing guns at the RNC, Scott is risking a fatality, be it intentional, accidental or a combination of the two, and he will have to shoulder the burden. In the wake of Trayvon Martin’s death, Florida as a state will suffer from being perceived as callous. One can only hope that a terrible situation such as the Martin case will not occur again. Unfortunately, when given the opportunity, history often times repeats itself.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

14 comments

Fred
Thu May 24 2012 21:43
"And another thing. Everyone talks about how the Constitution is this "holy sacred document" but they fail to realize the second amendment was written over 200 years ago. Times have changed. Deal with it."

Once more, I did not write this. It's cute though that whoever did thinks this is what I believe.

@William You wrote a very rational response so I don't really have a problem with your post. My only beef is with people who insult the writers and the paper whenever an opinion they disagree with (usually a liberal one) is expressed. It kind of makes our university look bad.

William
Thu May 24 2012 20:26
Yes, a good straw man argument will really stick it to those "gun nuts.".

Gun rights are one of the most contested topics when it comes to politics. Both sides throw a ridiculous amount of money at lobbying it. It is true that the times have changed since the second amendment was written; however, countless supreme court justices have seen fit to maintain the amendment through multiple cases.

Now to the article. "Someone" brings up a very rational argument. Criminals are criminals, law abiding citizens are law abiding citizens. Concealed carry holders go through safety courses, background checks, and varying levels of proficiency tests through legal means for the privilege of carrying a concealed firearm. Criminals stick it in their holster/pocket/waistband and go. They are law breakers. Therefore, if you try and either create a law which limits law abiding citizens, or suspend a law which grants law abiding citizens additional rights, you only serve to inhibit the law abiding citizen. At this point the only people carrying firearms are the criminals. You could argue that we just ban firearms but you'll find that to be none too successful. I could mention the whole "an armed society is a polite society" schtick but that is far too overused in this context.

In a perfect world we would all walk through the streets waving at each other and everything would be roses. Sadly, we do not live in a perfect world. There are people who mean to do you bodily harm because they think they deserve what you have, or whatever else goes through their mind; I don't claim to be a criminal psychologist so I honestly have no clue what goes through the mind of a criminal.

I have personally witnessed someone get shot within a half mile of campus. I have also been "interviewed" at least once to my knowledge. The fact that it even got to that point was an error on my part and luckily I 'failed' the interview. If you have no clue what I am talking about you should research criminal interviews and situational awareness.

Look at the tangent I have gotten myself into. Anyways, hopefully an individual against firearms will put forth some rational arguments rather than claim I am a gun nut or conspiracy theorist so we can get a dialogue going.

Real Fred
Thu May 24 2012 13:08
And another thing. Everyone talks about how the Constitution is this "holy sacred document" but they fail to realize the second amendment was written over 200 years ago. Times have changed. Deal with it.
Real Fred
Thu May 24 2012 09:49
"You should title this piece "Lack of Suspension of Constitution is Irresponsible". "

I didn't write this. Guess I must have offended someone with my "gun nut" comment, but thank you for proving my point. If you guys showed some level headedness in your responses instead of rambling about, "How dare this so-called newspaper publish this FILTH?!?!" I wouldn't make fun of you.

Fred
Thu May 24 2012 09:25
You should title this piece "Lack of Suspension of Constitution is Irresponsible".
Fred
Wed May 23 2012 22:41
Never fails. Every time an article about guns gets published by CFF, all the gun nuts come out to troll.
Someone
Wed May 23 2012 21:16
"A lock only serves to keep good people good." - Me

Governor Scott's comment is spot on. Banning the carrying of weapons by laws abiding citizens does nothing to those who wish to forgo the law, because they (read: criminals) by definition don't care about the law. If someone intends to cause trouble they are going to find a way to do it. It isn't like a person planning to kill someone would walk up to the area, see a sign stating no guns and think, "darn, I was going to blow their brains out, but this sign says it would be against the law for me to carry my gun beyond an imaginary line. I guess I better go back home and rethink this plan."

And how dare you try and draw consequences between the trayvon martin shooting, the Alexander shooting, and the Gabriel Giffords shooting. Yeah, they all involved one person shooting another person(s) but the context of each event is completely independent of each other; in particular the Arizona incident.

I honestly can't believe this paper is publishing such contrived filth. If I had more time I would submit a piece to this paper to provide a less biased opinion of firearms and carry rights. Alas, I only have time to berate you for this horrible article.

Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 13:34
"but it is partisan and absolutely insulting to the residents of Tampa."

Because the entire staff of this paper isn't democrat. Right. Please tell me the Future doesn't get funding from student fees.

Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 12:12
Good Grief! This OP-ED is written by the Editorial Staff of the paper?! Poorly written. Poorly researched. I guess then I have complete disregard for the stigma of the college newspaper.
Anonymous
Thu May 17 2012 11:11
Governor Scott has done a lot of stupid things to complain about, but this is not one of them.
Anonymous
Thu May 17 2012 00:57
Time, place and manner restrictions can in fact be imposed with respect to guns. Guns are already banned inside the convention, and the Secret Service could theoretically extend the ban to outside the convention. The real question is whether the ban would be a good idea.
Rich7553
Thu May 17 2012 00:18
Did it occur to anyone on the editorial staff at Central Florida Future that the Governor doesn't have the authority to suspend Florida law even temporarily lacking a bonafide emergency? Did it occur to the editorial staff at Central Florida Future that the ban would ONLY AFFECT LICENSED CARRIERS? Unless one is an armed guard on duty, a law enforcement officer, or a licensed concealed carrier, it is a FELONY to carry a concealed weapon in Florida. Since armed guards and law enforcement officers would be exempted from the ban, it would affect licensees only, the very people about whom Mayor Buckhorn stated he wasn't worried! Now, get back to your studies. It seems you have quite a way to go.
TL671
Wed May 16 2012 22:38
"absolutely insulting to the residents of Tampa".

You are kidding, right? I think it would be much more insulting if a sitting governor said residents of Tampa couldn't be trusted, by banning legally carried firearms, being carried by law abiding citizens. Not to mention that these are the same blood in the streets, wild west shoot-outs, parking lot fire-fights lies, that the anti-gun/anti-freedom, citizens disarmament lobby have been spouting for 25+ years, that have yet to be proven.

Anonymous
Wed May 16 2012 18:26
Prediction: Just as the sky didn't fall when right to carry and shall issue passed, the same will be true at the RNC. There will be no shooting accidental or otherwise, and we will all remember this whole thing as more hysteria from citizen disarmament zealots.




log out