Bros icing bros needs a chill pill

By Our Stance

Published: Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Bromania. Brotastic. Brononymous.

Hey bro, it's getting old, and now, just plain disgusting.

Since the unfortunate start of Jersey Shore, the classiest show to ever grace our televisions, it seems that everything is becoming "bro-ified," and we aren't exactly sure how we feel about that.

The bro phenomenon — a bronomenon, if you will — has even been escalated into a popular college drinking game called Bros Icing Bros. We're sure you've heard about it, but let us enlighten those who tend not to associate with bros or go to frat parties.

The game is simple but could involve a slight amount of cunning and trickery.

Here is how one would go about icing a bro, according to brosicingbros.com (yes, there's a website): Buy Smirnoff Ice and present it to one of your bros in any manner.

Your bro must instantly get on one knee and chug the Smirnoff Ice on the spot regardless of setting.

However, a bro can "ice block." If a bro is presented with a Smirnoff Ice but came "packin' with his own ice," then the initial bro must drink both Smirnoff Ices.

Yup, that's the gist of it.

The fun part is supposed to be about finding interesting ways to present the wretched drink to a fellow bro.

The website has plenty of ideas, examples and incriminating photos. We personally enjoyed the one where the Smirnoff was hidden inside a bro's protein shake powder.

Good job, bro.

Now, be forewarned, there are serious consequences should a bro refuse to be "iced."

That bro will be "excommunicated" or "shunned" and can never again ice or be iced.

Quite frankly, we're surprised the community — excuse us, the brommunity — knew what the words "excommunicated" and "shunned" meant.

This bronomenon has gained a lot of attention outside the college sphere. The New York Times wrote an article about it, and entertainers have been in on the game also.

The game has also been an Internet sensation, with blogs, pictures and groups about bros getting iced popping up everywhere.

We would venture to say that had it not been for the Internet, the game would have either not have gotten such attention or the epidemic would not have spread at all.

Yes, we see the hilarity of it all, but at the same time this just gives another excuse for college kids to drink themselves into oblivion.

It would be a little less worrisome if we saw some opposition toward this hazard.

Nothing good can come out of an abundance of college students drinking an entire bottle of Smirnoff Ice as fast as possible.

Rest assured, though, we know that eventually reports will surface of some bro getting seriously injured in a fight with another bro who refused to get iced.

We can see the headline now: "Breaking news: Bro-on-bro crime increases due to popular drinking game."

We don't mean to mimic the worn out expression "it's all fun and games until somebody gets hurt," but we can't help but feel that this is just a little bit absurd.

If anything, it's upsetting that Smirnoff Ice, an intolerable-tasting drink, is getting a lot of money off this game.

So, to all the bros out there: Enough with the icing.

Comments

20 comments
Anonymous
Tue Jul 20 2010 20:21
I have the answer to all these problems! I present to you icing insurance!

www.icinginsurance.com

Mike M.
Mon Jun 21 2010 18:47
This is a joke. Just because the author of this article did not have a good enough personality to make friends while he is in college, doesn't mean you have to try and make fun of something that is obviously taking over the country. Get over it pal.... This GAME is funny, and that is all it is, a game. Relax, keep sitting in your room on a Friday night and writing for you little paper. You are just mad cause no one wants to ICE you. getoverit.
Stephen M
Mon Jun 21 2010 00:12
I plan on this being the last CFF post I ever make.

@Anonymous:

I graduated. I am done being a student and playing these childish games with students like yourself. These newspaper/blog/SGA rivalries are meaningless and I am moving on to bigger and better things in life (I hope one day you decide to do this too). The reason that the "student voice" you referenced is not heard is because of people like yourself who are more interested in attacking fellow students and enhancing your own ego than actually working to strengthen student rights. Your arguments are the same ignorant, self-serving distractions that I've heard for years (i.e., you accuse people of not "asking questions" of the BOG about tuition increases, when it is clear that you did not ask such questions yourself because the BOG does not even allow students to speak to them)--and frankly I'm glad that I'm done with it. You and your buddies will probably continue to wallow in the "glory" of your fantasy student advocacy for the rest of your time in college, even though your "work" is entirely based on your pitifully fragmented understanding of how the higher education system's structure and functions. You probably will even be able to convince some other students that you really do know what you're talking about, and your sensational statements and accusations will garner you much attention. But in the end you are only attention-seeking and grandstanding, and you will have little, if any, true accomplishments to stand on while your peers who legitimately give a damn will at least have put forward an honest effort to improve the quality of life for students. More likely than not it will be you who holds back positive change for students more successfully than any administrator, BOG member, or anyone else who truly matters ever will.

And as to your ad hominem: NikkiNicho has done more work on behalf of your "student voice" than many people in Student Government combined, and given your immature ego and ignorance, she clearly has accomplished light years more than you can even conceive of accomplishing.

As for me, and all the people who have legitimately cared, it's good to finally be moving on from this nonsense. There's a much bigger world outside of UCF, and people suffering much moreso than students. I look forward to new challenges and advocacy on a much greater scale. But as for the people who legitimately care and still remain at UCF, it's truly saddening to me that they will have to continue to deal with people like you. I guess it's just the way of things; there was some jerk who bred you, and you will breed others who come to UCF... and you will always work to worsen the problems that you decry.

If you truly do want to help students and enhance student rights, then my only advice to you is to "shut up. Nobody wants to hear your crap."

NikkiNicho
Sun Jun 20 2010 09:38
It tickles me to think about discussing the BOG on the bros icing bros article (haha). Just so you know: the BOG and the state legislature have been planning this tuition raise for years. They have heard all of the arguments. The BOG is not required to listen to students (unlike the state, when they were in control of that). The BOG also now have more or less unlimited power over these things due to the settlement of the recent law suit. Yes, it is more like the BORG (you will be assimilated!)

I just know better how to spend my time (more wisely than just going up to a meeting and try to shout at them when they don't have to listen to me). Stephen and myself (and members of student organization SLAP) have been trying to mobilize students to work on a state wide constitutional amendment campaign to remove the *supreme powers* of the BOG from the state constitution (thanks for asking, what are you and your significant other up to?).
Not suggesting that getting rid of the BOG gets rid of the tuition hiking problem completely (as I mentioned before, when the power goes back to the state legislature, they were still planning on implementing the same rate of raise), but it does at least put that power back into the hands of people who are legitimately responsible to us as constituents (they are elected officials), and who have a more holistic understanding of the role education plays in the Florida economy and society.

Unlike the state legislature the BOG is: not elected, does not have to listen to us, is not responsible to a community of constituents, is appointed by the governor at the time, and holds 8 year terms (longer than state legislators).

Unfortunately, running a constitutional amendment campaign across the entire state of Florida takes a lot of effort and a lot of networking with people at other schools, and is also going to be very monotonous and tedious, and probably take the entire course of student's college careers (4 years approx., as I mentioned earlier), and over all isn't a very "sexy" campaign for college students to work on. And, the only statewide progressive student network that does exist is the FL YES Coalition (which was directly affected by the BOG lawsuit over the Student Green Energy Fund), is kind of busy addressing the oil spill (as their prime initiative is as an environmental organization).

Oops, sorry, am I spewing useless crap that apparently belongs to someone who has been at UCF too long (I didn't know 3 years was too long to be at a university)? Fine fine, I'll let everyone figure out the rest for themselves (hint: google "Florida Board of Governors lawsuit" "Bill McCollum")

NikkiNicho
Sun Jun 20 2010 09:04
Please email me anonymous (Sun Jun 20 2010 02:42), you seem to have some other issues you would like to express to me that require more thorough discussion than I think is possible on a CFF comment section: NikkiNicho@gmail.com

Also (to address your ad hominem), it is my 4th year at UCF in August. Most students spend 4 years to get one baccalaureate, I am spending 4 years here to get 2. Obviously you don't know me as well as you think ._.

Anonymous
Sun Jun 20 2010 02:42
Nikki, why don't you graduate? Where were you at the BOG meeting when tuition was being hiked? Why weren't you asking questions to the BOG to try and stop it? Where was your boyfriend? WHERE WAS THE STUDENT VOICE? You are an absolute disgrace to the progressive movement.

YOU HAVE CONFORMED!

Now shut up. No one wants to hear your crap.

NikkiNicho
Sat Jun 19 2010 20:46
Brononymous is right about one thing: It is not a school newspaper rivalry.
But, for this reason:
Only one is a school newspaper, and has journalistic integrity.
One is a blog that is used for "scandalmongering" and promoting a specific SGA political and business agenda.
Brononymous
Sat Jun 19 2010 14:27
It's not that much of a rivalry anymore.

The readers, the viewers, the advertisers, and the NYT have decided the true winner.

apc
Sat Jun 19 2010 14:02
no one cares about your retarded school newspaper rivalry, shut up.
Anonymous
Fri Jun 18 2010 23:37
That blog didn't have reporters anywhere. They had friends of people that worked at the site taking pictures with video phones. To even insinuate they have global reporters is laughable and shows just how little credibility both your site and your argument have.
Brononymous
Fri Jun 18 2010 18:33
You mean that horrible website that had reporters in South Africa and Israel this summer to cover the flotilla incident and the World Cup?

Where did the CFF send people again?

Slacktivist
Fri Jun 18 2010 09:32
"Brononymous", GTFO and go back to reading that horrible, biased, propagandized BLOG. Yes, it is JUST a BLOG. Or get real!
Anonymous
Thu Jun 17 2010 17:33
Hmmm. I've never seen a student paper by the name of KnightNews.com. However, I have seen a horrible P.O.S. of a website that thinks they are a real news source by that name.
Brononymous
Thu Jun 17 2010 16:13
The Daily Buzz is broadcast nationally. And the New York Times is the pinnacle of journalism.

And the CFF is not even considered the student paper anymore according to them.

Student
Thu Jun 17 2010 14:02
Lol, yeah "no one reads it" except fro "Brononymous" who comments on CFF all the time (with rather idiotic and unsupported statements).
Talk about bitterness, sheesh!
Anonymous
Thu Jun 17 2010 12:41
I believe the CFF has more viewers on their website alone in the matter of 1 hour than the Daily Buzz Morning Show has in one week...

Nice try, Stein.

Brononymous
Thu Jun 17 2010 12:04
Looks like someone is mad they didn't get to the trend first and then get their article talked about by the New York Times and the Daily Buzz Morning Show.

So sad.

This kind of bitterness is the reason nobody reads CFF anymore.

Anonymous
Thu Jun 17 2010 11:43
Bro hater.
Anonymous
Thu Jun 17 2010 09:43
I agree with this article. Don't ice! To understand the repercussions: youtube search "Rad Bromance"
Don't let it happen to you!
Anonymous
Wed Jun 16 2010 19:55
Re: "another excuse for college kids to drink themselves into oblivion"....or just have a little fun.
View full site