Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Organic food not beneficial to planet

Guest Columnist

Published: Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Updated: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 14:11

Organic. The word conjures up images of pure unspoiled harvest, of simpler times. Its advocates speak of it as though it is the only way to eat in this new postmodern world, too saturated with food that is chock full of pesticides, genetic engineering and unhealthy hormones. "It's unnatural," they commonly deride, "and it's going to destroy our health."

This is the very definition of a first-world problem.

According to Scientific American, organic farming yields less than half of what traditional farming does. For every acre of land that is being used to create the organic food you eat is one less acre of traditional farming, and in return that much less food.

Sadly, that is not an option for the world we live in. As of now, we aren't even sure if we have enough food to feed our current population. According to the World Food Programme, hunger kills more people in the world than AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis combined. Tonight, one in seven people will go to bed hungry, not knowing where their next meal will come from.

This is not just a foreign issue that affects only third-world countries. According to a study commissioned by Feeding America, more than a quarter of the children in Orange County are considered "food insecure." This past Sunday, 60 Minutes came to Seminole County for the second time this year to show just how bad childhood hunger has gotten here in Central Florida.

And it's only going to get worse. According to the Economist, in October the world's population hit seven billion; by 2050 that number is going to jump up to nine billion. To feed this new wave of people, we will need to start producing 60-70 percent more food than we do now, according Cosmos magazine. Many are skeptical if this is even possible, myself included. If we're going to do it, we're going to need to use every tool at our disposal.

While first-world champions of organic food are asking, "What's in my food?" people around the world just want to know, "Will there be food?"

But what of the health issues? If our food is unhealthy, wouldn't it be amoral to continue feeding it to the population, despite food shortages? Yes it would, but thankfully there is little evidence that non-organic food is unhealthy.

The United Kingdom's Food Standards Agency wanted to get to the bottom of the health risks attributed to genetically altered food. They pored over health reports and nutrient levels in crops and livestock over the past 50 years. They found found that there is little evidence to support the claim that organic food is healthier than traditional food. This is not the only study of its kind. Heaps of research have been done on the subject, all coming out the same.

In a perfect world, I too would buy organic food. However, we don't live in a perfect world. In the world we live in, we need to face facts and understand that our future is going to be hard. If there is a way of making more food for less, and if there was a way of making it environmentally friendly and without any health effects, we owe it to our planet to jump at that opportunity.

So next time you're in the supermarket, don't shell out that extra $3 for organic milk. Save your money, and save the future of our planet while you're at it.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

16 comments

Anonymous
Fri Oct 5 2012 01:20
Now I understand why we're doing a critical appraisal of this article. It is flawed and lacks support.
Anonymous
Thu Oct 4 2012 11:36
Where Eastman succeeds is in raising awareness about how we will feed the world in 2050, however all the arguments lose integrity due to the lack of an actual definition of traditional and organic farming.
Anonymous
Thu Oct 4 2012 11:35
In the context of your article you raise valid points. While we respect your position on organic food and it's relationship to world hunger, we find your claims lacked reputable evidence and academic prestige.
Anonymous
Thu Oct 4 2012 11:32
By stating that "organic food is not beneficial to the planet", the author is assuming that "traditional" farming is not harmful to the planet. While this may be true, the ambiguity within the facts and lack of evidence provided by the author makes it difficult for the article to be taken seriously. Furthermore, without any consideration to evidence supporting counterarguments, the author does not recognize that there may be validity to organic farming.
GGR107 0402 Tutorial, University of Toronto.
Anonymous
Wed Oct 3 2012 11:25
Brian, you provide us with a very courageous and thought provoking piece. It is very convincing given all of the research that you have done; however, we felt that you did not make your arguments that clear and accurate because we found that your writing had many contradictions, generalizations, and did not provide any solutions for the problems at hand.
GGR107 0201 Tutorial.
Ron
Fri Dec 9 2011 00:58
We don't need more food, we need less people! More food makes more people makes more food shortages makes people with silly haircuts write bad articles about needing more bad food.
Fred D.
Thu Dec 8 2011 01:05
Everyone keeps saying this article was poorly researched and not based in fact, yet no one has responded with any legitimate counter argument. Everyone keeps saying that "its unhealthy" and "it's unsafe" and "everything in here is a lie!" I am very disappointed in the readers of this paper, for thinking that comments like this are going to convince anyone of anything. You have something to say at least base it in fact, otherwise you just feed into the stereotype of organic food eaters, unknowledgeable hippies. All the sources in this appear to be legit, and none of it sounds like a lie. If you have a better argument than put it out there, but the way everyones doing it now just sounds silly.
A. Rock
Wed Dec 7 2011 13:05
This article was wrote without a solid basis, poor research and has failed to convince the audience of your point. I'd give it a D.
Do you not know that organic foods are on the rise? Grocery chains are investing millions into this area. Why? Because people are demanding it and if the stores do not respond they will go out of business.
The area I live in, in South-Western Ontario, Canada produces a lot of organic food and this area is not only thriving, but growing.
People are willing to pay higher prices for organic food because they care about what goes into their body. They don't want to get sick because of the foods they eat. They want to live longer, healthier lives free of disease. Too many people in North America are literally eating themselves to death; whether it's eating food that's grown with chemicals or GMO's, other forms of non-organic processing, over indulging or not eating a balanced diet.
It's time we wake up and realise that not everything we're told is the truth. Do your own research and make informed decisions!
A. Rock
Wed Dec 7 2011 13:04
This article was wrote without a solid basis, poor research and has failed to convince the audience of your point. I'd give it a D.
Do you not know that organic foods are on the rise? Grocery chains are investing millions into this area. Why? Because people are demanding it and if the stores do not respond they will go out of business.
The area I live in, in South-Western Ontario, Canada produces a lot of organic food and this area is not only thriving, but growing.
People are willing to pay higher prices for organic food because they care about what goes into their body. They don't want to get sick because of the foods they eat. They want to live longer, healthier lives free of disease. Too many people in North America are literally eating themselves to death; whether it's eating food that's grown with chemicals or GMO's, other forms of non-organic processing, over indulging or not eating a balanced diet.
It's time we wake up and realise that not everything we're told is the truth. Do your own research and make informed decisions!
Anonymous
Tue Dec 6 2011 01:03
1. This article is more accurate than a lot of people care to believe.
2. Bringing up Orange County kids was a terrible point.
3. Organic farming is not about sustainability, some organic farming is sustainable, but much is not.
4. Most of the corn we grow in the country is not the kind of corn you can eat off a stalk, it's a different species. Learn your corn.
5. There isn't enough food, though it's true the real problem is that the food there is isn't able to be sent where it's needed.
Anonymous
Mon Dec 5 2011 22:07
There is no shortage of food. There's more than enough food to feed the whole world several times over. The problem is that many people, especially in less developed countries, don't have enough money to afford food.
Anonymous
Sun Dec 4 2011 21:42
this article about organic food just makes me want to go out and eat a mcrib
Fred D.
Sun Dec 4 2011 21:29
Get a job hippies!
Anonymous
Sat Dec 3 2011 21:00
Hilarious. This would be more appropriate for The Onion.
Anonymous
Thu Dec 1 2011 09:59
You are naive to think that you can "debunk" the idea of organic food by your short little article. You are making way too many generalizations in your piece. Kids in Orange County aren't "food insecure" because of a shortage of food, they're "food insecure" because they don't have the money to buy food. There's a major difference. We owe it to our planet to produce food in an environmentally-friendly and sustainable fashion. Organic farming is the way to do this. Flooding our fields with pesticides, herbicides and other hazardous chemicals may drastically increase yields - but is it really worth it when those very crops are harmful to the population it feeds? 90% of all corn grown for consumption is inedible off the stalk. It is sent to be processed and turned into thousands of different "food" items. Only then is it consumable, but not necessarily nutritional.

Do a little more research before publishing an article such as this, Mr. Eastman. That's part of what reporting requires.

Anonymous
Thu Dec 1 2011 06:09
This is just about the most stupid article that I have ever seen. It is filled with misinformation and outright lies. Is BigAg now paying clueless students to write propaganda to shill for GMO and chemical based agriculture?

I don't see how anyone can take this article seriously.





log out