Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

SGA unbiased; GSA is unnecessary, avoidable

Guest Columnist

Published: Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Updated: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 16:02

Let me propose a question: What is a student? It's a simple question, really, with a simple answer. A person who is engaged in learning is what I would call a student. Some students learn different trades and skills than others, but they are students never the less. In my opinion, the Student Government Association is an entity designed to represent the best interests of the student body of UCF and advocate on their behalf.

Obviously with almost 60,000 students, there are a plethora of issues that students opine about, and it is the duty and responsibility of myself and other SGA members to address those issues. This brings me to my next question: When did this thing stop becoming Student Government and start becoming Undergraduate Government?

Do graduate students have different needs than undergraduate students? Absolutely. So do Rosen College students, regional students and Burnett Honors College students. The hospitality student has different needs than the engineering student, etc. To say there needs to be a new branch of student government (Graduate Student Assembly) just for graduate students is to say that there is something fundamentally wrong with the way SGA funds students. The argument should not be for another branch with more bureaucracy and red tape; instead, we should change what we have. SGA is here to address the issues of all students at the UCF, not just undergraduate students.

To say graduate students have been misrepresented or underrepresented at UCF is a farce and straight-up lie. SGA has put a tremendous amount of effort into assisting graduate student needs. Graduate students receive more funds per capita than undergraduate students; $30,000 is specifically designated to graduate student programming in Student Outreach Services. SGA makes painstaking strides to insure that our graduate assistants have tuition waivers. Graduate students also take part in utilizing normal services everyone else uses such as the Student Union, the Recreation and Wellness Center and Student Legal Services.

To say graduate students don't get their fair share is just not true. Do graduate students have certain needs that SGA should tailor to? Yes. So do many other students at UCF, and that is precisely what we do in SGA, however, we cannot put a premium on one group over another. I want to see programming geared toward graduate students and graduate student issues addressed via the legislative and executive branches as it is now.

I stated earlier, SOS is an entire entity geared toward outreaching to regional students, nontraditional students and yes, graduate students. The almost 9,000 graduate students are a quite large constituency of the student population.

Many graduate students are extremely grateful for the funds SGA provides, advocacy given and services offered. They do not give bonuses to the College of Engineering and Computer Science because many of them have five-year programs, nor do we give extra money to students who are doing honors in their respective majors. Funds are based on the merit of their programs and are allocated to assist and support all students at UCF. As a result, many students are grateful and only ask that they continue to be treated as equals and not placed on a pedestal.

Graduate students do have the second largest amount of seats on the student senate, and they do not need to have an entire separate assembly for their own funding and issues. Let's not lose sight of the idea that SGA represents all students, not just a select few and certainly not some more than others.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

11 comments

TrollWatch
Mon Feb 20 2012 11:17
The fundamental point made here is that graduate students shouldn't be granted special consideration over all of the disparate student groups on campus. A point which is lost, buried under all of these anonymous rants.
Anonymous
Fri Feb 17 2012 14:24
Another issue that hasn't been addressed is that GSA could protect the interests of graduate assistants (GTAs and GRAs) at UCF. Currently, we do not have a public platform to voice our concerns, nor do we have a Union or a collective bargaining agreement with the administration (as is the case at U of Florida and many other public universities).

We are half time employees, teach classes, assist in instruction, conduct grant-funded research, yet we do not have bargaining rights like any other employee union. The stipends of GAs at UCF, around $11/hr in many colleges and departments, is embarrassing in comparison to other Florida public institutions. Moreover, it simply pales in comparison to wages offered by nationally-ranked universities. This is a shame and abusive use of skilled workers. At this rate, UCF will never become the competitive research university it wants to be. But SGA wouldn't understand, nor care about this.

Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 21:02
"...there are a plethora of issues that students opine about..."

Choke me.

Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 20:07
Mr. Miller, while I appreciate your opinion, it's evident that you aren't a graduate student and do not understand how different graduate and undergraduate students are. As an undergrad, I was happy to pay and take an active part in using an activity fee, to be a member of multiple student organizations, and to participate in the social life of a typical college student. However, now as a graduate student, I simply have a different life and different needs than most of what I feel undergraduates care about--and I certainly do not approve of hundreds of dollars being used for your legislative and executive retreats while there are tons of hoops to jump through just to get a little bit of money to attend professional conferences to boost my career opportunities. Graduate students need a dedicated body that understands our needs in ways few undergraduates at this university seem to grasp. I thank you for voicing how you feel, but with the support of faculty and staff at all levels of this university, we are a valid assembly and we do not plan to go anywhere.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 17:23
Miller stated in his campaign platform that "the fundamental being to a student is how they are represented", and we, the graduate students at UCF, do not feel that we are currently represented adequately.

Our classes are not structured in the same way as undergrads' are. Our end goals, particularly for those of us pursuing doctorates, are not the same as undergrads' goals. The requirements for our research-based degrees are quite different from undergrads'. So why, then, does it make sense to treat us like undergrads?

Listen to your constituents. We've already made it quite clear what we want.

Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 16:35
*Time Budget Estimation (168 hours per week):
Graduate Students:
56 Sleep
20 Classes
20 Assistantship
15 Answering and writing emails
14 Driving to/from UCF, parking (7 days/wk)
10 Cleaning, laundry, lawn care, personal hygeine, etc
20 Research
13 Fun, meals

Undergraduate Students:
56 Sleep
20 Classes
20 Job
5 Answering and writing emails
10 Driving to/from UCF, parking (5 days/wk)
10 Cleaning, laundry, lawn care, personal hygeine, etc.
47 Fun, meals

Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 16:33
What a joke. His 'graduate-level thinking' is skewed statistics and falty logic. For something that doesn't need to be passed, it is on its thirs reading tonight.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 16:32
I think there are two main reasons why SGA just doesn't work for graduate students.

First, there is a major disconnect between the typical undergraduate's amount of expendable time (I estimate around 47 hrs/week) and that of graduate students (same estimation scheme comes out to 13 hrs/week)*. Although SGA has really tried to include graduate students in the shaping of UCF by appropriating seats on Senate, most of us, despite our desire to contribute, just don't have the time. This leads to unfilled College of Graduate Studies seats and an overall lack of participation in many university events.

Second, our main focuses are different. Most undergraduates come to a major university expecting the full college experience--learning, independence, personal growth, and a thriving social scene that will provide memories and friendships to last a lifetime. These are the Golden Years. Graduate students have had this wonderful and robust experience and are now more interested in reaping benefits to their careers (yes, academics are the career here) for all the hours and hours of work that we put in. Quite simply, I would rather have more funds allocated toward conference travel or other academically-oriented things than to get to go to Universal for free for a few hours. This undergraduate experience is an important rite of passage, and I think it should be supported. However, a Senate dominated by this mindset can be a setback when we graduate students want to be heard.

The GSA is necessary because it will allow graduate students to be represented in a way that works for them, without the same time commitments required of SGA senators and without having to try to convince the funding agency that academic goals are worth investing in...not to mention all of the ethical issues that have been pointed out about having to beg your students for conference travel money. I think Miller's article has it right in saying that SGA hasn't met graduate student needs, but he gets it wrong in thinking that a few tweaks to the senate are going to eliminate all the "red tape" we face in trying to participate.

Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 15:36
Josh - Move on and get a real job. Or are you and Kilbride trying to carve out careers in the Student Union?
Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 15:03
What's even the purpose of this article? The Constitutional Amendment to create the GSA passed the 43rd Senate and passed the Student Body in the fall--after the grad students presented letters of endorsement from the Dean of every single college and received support from the Provost for the initiative. A clear majority of Senators in the 44th voted against an amendment to repeal it. Obviously, the Graduate Student Assembly is here to stay.

All of these people understand that SGA is dominated by undergrads and their interests--and claiming that SGA is adequately receptive to graduate student needs is what's the farce and straight-up lie, and your posting of this article proves that. Your opinion does not supersede that of an entire constituency of students, the entire administration, two Senates, and the Student Body. Get over it, and get over yourself.

Anonymous
Thu Feb 16 2012 14:44
Josh Miller writes a very compelling argument, definitely graduate-level writing. Great Job




log out