Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Soda ban puts fair limit on culture of excess

Guest Columnist

Published: Sunday, June 10, 2012

Updated: Sunday, June 10, 2012 15:06

If you haven’t heard, the mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg, has proposed a ban that would limit the sale of all sugary drinks over 16 ounces in New York. That means no more Big Gulps from 7-Eleven, weighing in at 32 ounces, or the average large soda from McDonald’s, which is 28 ounces.

Since this ban was proposed last week, it has garnered criticism from all over the country, especially from the companies that sell these oversized drinks. They argue that this is an attack on individual choice, no matter how deadly that choice might be to consumers.

Bloomberg’s proposed ban would make New York City the first U.S. city to limit the portion size to its citizens, which is by no means a bad thing. It should come as no surprise that America is the fattest developed nation in the entire world. One-third of Americans are obese, while an additional one-third of the country is overweight. This can be attributed to an oversized American food culture that has seemed to puzzle the rest of the world, especially in terms of portion. For example, the average portion of soda in France is 52 percent smaller than one in the U.S.

Let’s think back to another dietary eye-opener that took place in New York City. Super Size Me, a documentary about an experiment performed by director and filmmaker Morgan Spurlock, reveals how McDonald’s appeals to children by making the company appeal directly to them as an audience. Ronald McDonald, the always smiling and lovable clown, is an example of how McDonald’s attempts to cater directly to its child audience.

Now, the top advertising tactic of soft drink companies is not to prey on the naivety of children like McDonald’s does, but it does go after something else that people value — the money in their wallets.

If you buy a Big Gulp at 7-Eleven, you’re buying 32 ounces of soda for under $2. This is the epitome of American “value” – more for less. However, setting up Americans to consume larger portions for more value is turning out to be a very dangerous trick. Obesity is the third leading cause of preventable death in America, as a study performed by the Harvard School of Public Health concluded. Not only are we living unhealthy and potentially deathly lifestyles, but our generation is passing these trends on to the next one, as childhood obesity has more than tripled in the past 30 years, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. By limiting the portion size on soft drinks, Bloomberg’s proposed ban will help foster an environment of healthy choices instead of one that preaches the right of personal choice, but instead fuels a pre-marketed destiny determined to make Americans obese. It’s obvious that soft drink companies would rather gain a profit from their customers’ unhealthy choices than watch them choose healthy alternatives.

By proposing this soda ban, Bloomberg is simply watching out for his fellow New Yorkers. In a soft drink market where manipulation by price is key, someone had to draw the line and declare that enough was enough. It’s time for New York City, and possibly others to follow, to shrink our super-size culture, not just for ourselves, but for the next generation of young Americans. 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

7 comments

Anonymous
Tue Mar 5 2013 09:20
I'm just reading this now but the author is a moron. Try thinking for yourself.
Anonymous
Wed Jun 13 2012 10:25
It's a shame there are people like Aubrey who have to have other people and organizations do her thinking for her instead of making her own decisions.
Anonymous
Tue Jun 12 2012 11:21
Another idiot that needs to have the government tell them "no".
EnemyofStatists
Tue Jun 12 2012 11:15
Julia, is that you? Are you unable to control yourself and thus need to cede control of your life to the state?
Every thing that you permit the government to do for you instead of doing for yourself diminishes you as a person and eats away at your freedom to control your own life.
It is a very small step from government saying that you can't do something to it saying that you must do something.
jkellam6
Tue Jun 12 2012 00:24
Healthy living is an issue of extreme importance to me, but of even more importance is personal choice. When I first heard about this, I had mixed feelings. Soda is one of the leading causes of obesity, and people truly get addicted to it, not so different than people do to cigarettes. However, like cigarettes, most, if not all, people realize that they are making a bad choice when they drink soda. I also think this ban will make little to no difference, because people will just by twice as many of the smaller sizes. Also, it gives a little bit of credibility to the right-wing argument of the emerging "nanny state", what I would usually consider a silly argument. I think the answer lies in education and higher taxes on high-sugar, high-sodium food and drink products. But I definitely agree with the writer that this country does have a problem and something needs to be done about it, I just disagree with the method being used as a solution.
Soda is Bad, Fascism is Worse
Tue Jun 12 2012 00:15
I don't even drink soda, but why is it your business what anyone puts in their body? What is wrong with your brain that makes want to run everyone's life? Where does this need to control others come from? What makes you think you know best, when obviously you have barely a superficial understanding of the issues at hand? You'll support insane nanny state garbage like this but where is the outrage over the real culprit of the obesity epidemic, like the sugar quotas and corn subsidies that your beloved government has forced on the American people? The food fascists need to go.
Anonymous
Mon Jun 11 2012 14:30
Have you ever had a 16oz drink? I could finish three of those in one sitting and I'm 135lbs. If you want a ban, ban large drinks - this is almost nothing.




log out