Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Spanking your child is not discipline, it’s abuse

Guest Columnist

Published: Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Updated: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 15:11

Should you spank your children? No. Should you spank your children to exert authority? Still no! Imagine a world where your teacher smacks you in the face for getting a bad grade. A place where your boss punches you in the face for not filing a report, maybe a server throwing a plate at your head for a bad tip. Sounds bad, right? So why would you hit your child?

It is not harmless, and it is abuse — abuse that happens too often. National Child Abuse Statistics show that a report of child abuse is made every 10 seconds and more than five children die every day as a result of child abuse.

Preacher Michael Pearl thinks of abuse as a principle to teach toddlers to submit to authority. Pearl wrote a book called To Train Up a Child. To add insult to injury, it ended up in a crime scene. On Sept. 29, a child's parents were charged with homicide by abuse after the death of a third child. Pearl's book was found in their home. More than 670,000 copies are in circulation and are especially popular among Christians who home school their children.

Forgive me for not supporting the book that provides instructions on using a switch on babies as young as six months. According to Administration of Children and Family in 2009, four-fifths of all child fatalities were younger than 4 years old. Out of those, 46.2 percent of child fatalities were younger than 1 year old, 17.8 percent were 1 year old, 10.3 percent were 2 years old and 6.5 percent were 3 years old.

Further cases range from parents beating children with 15-inch plastic tubes, recommended by Pearl, to children starving because "a little fasting is good training." National child abuse statistics on childhelp.com show that about 30 percent of abused and neglected children will continue the horrible cycle and later abuse their own children. About 80 percent of 21 year olds who were abused as children met criteria for at least one psychological disorder. Abused children are 25 percent more likely to experience teen pregnancy. This is just some of the information you won't find in Pearl's book.

Hitting a child does not help the child and does not make a better parent, whether it's hitting, punching, slapping, pushing or spanking. The effects are not just physical, but they can mentally scar a child. According to Child Welfare Information Gateway, 80 percent of young adults who were abused have at least one psychiatric disorder at age 21. They develop antisocial traits and cases of depression.

The more you hit a child, the easier and worse it gets. It will escalate, and your children will suffer. Sadly, Texas Judge William Adams is a prime example. He viciously beat his 16-year-old daughter with a belt for more than seven minutes for using the Internet.

"No, in my mind I haven't done anything wrong other than discipline my child after she was caught stealing," Adams told KZTV, a Texas news station. "And I did lose my temper, but I've since apologized."

A parent's authority doesn't work when the child is dead or hospitalized.

There is an alternative to spanking your children, as hitting your children only teaches more violence. Persuasion and reasoning, on the other hand, teach the lesson without the mental and physical scars to prove it. If your child yells or breaks toys for attention, don't give the toys back to them or don't replace what they break. Make family or house rules with them. Give those options or choices – not the belt every time. If you want to exert your authority, do it like responsible parent. Don't exert your hand on your child. And if you can't handle that, then you don't deserve respect from your child or anyone else.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

11 comments

Anonymous
Sat Nov 19 2011 18:26
Research/recommended reading:

Spanking Can Make Children More Aggressive Later
(Tulane University)

Spanking Kids Increases Risk of Sexual Problems
(University of New Hampshire)

Use of Spanking for 3-Year-Old Children and Associated Intimate Partner Aggression or Violence
(American Academy of Pediatrics)

Spanking Children Can Lower IQ
(University of New Hampshire)

Recommended by professionals:

Plain Talk About Spanking
by Jordan Riak

The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children
by Tom Johnson

Anonymous
Sat Nov 19 2011 18:25
In light of Judge Adams video,

We often hear from those who fight to uphold this practice for those under the age of 18 (even to the blaming of the social maladies of the day on a supposed "lack" of it), but we rarely, if ever, find advocates for the return of corporal punishment to the general adult community, college campuses, inmate population, or military. Why is that?

Ask ten unyielding proponents of child/adolescent/teenage-only "spanking" about the "right" way to do it, and what would be abusive, indecent, or obscene, and you will get ten different answers.

These proponents should consider making their own video-recording of the "right way" to do it.

Visit Unlimited Justice or Parents and Teachers Against Violence in Education to learn more and add your voice.

MMead
Sat Nov 19 2011 18:22
The reasons and responses given by advocates of child/adolescent/teenage-only corporal punishment are nearly always the same:

1) "The Bible says...."

2) Research/statements from the religious fundamentalist sector (as opposed to those who believe Jesus would never condone hitting a child).

3) They're not doing it "right". I still haven't found any general consensus on a "right" method for "spanking" kids. In light of the Judge Adams video, such proponents should consider making their own video-recording of the "right" way to do it.

4) "I was 'spanked' (or bullied in school, or raised by the state, drank the green water,etc) and I turned out OK."

5) If you don't "spank" children, they'll end up in prison/hell/with terrible manners (hitting being confused with discipline).

Fred
Fri Nov 18 2011 10:15
I'm a pretty liberal person, but I also work as a substitute teacher and, with all due respect, I think the author of this piece is well-intentioned but does not understand how kids think. In my job, I've had kids that have ranged from being very easy to manage to those who were downright HORRID. Not just to authority figures, but to each other as well. I don't see how you can reach kids like that with just persuasion and reasoning when they don't care about their grades (and have told me so directly), they don't care about destroying property, and they don't care about disrupting the other students' learning.

Should children be spanked for every misbehavior? No. Are there certain cases where the behavior is so out of control that a spanking is merited? I think there is. It's not about abusing children, it's about instilling a sense of boundaries and respect for others and, ultimately, themselves. Oftentimes, just the THREAT of a spanking is enough to keep some kids in line.

Also, what Judge Adams did was a BEATING not a spanking. Using him as an example for why all physical discipline is abuse is hardly apt. People who discipline their kids do not deserve to be compared with people who abuse their kids.

Val
Fri Nov 18 2011 10:07
There's a difference between spanking and beating a child senseless. What this guy speaks about is beating because first of all punching a child is called abuse not spanking. Scott you really should do more research on your opinions before giving only half of the correct information.
Mike
Fri Nov 18 2011 09:54
I would like your next article explaining how you reason with a two year old which you make sound so easy.
Anonymous
Fri Nov 18 2011 09:18
If this guy is the product of "sparing the rod", then I urge you to not only spank your kids, but beat them senseless. Which would you rather have: a traumatized son or a whiny pu$$y like our friend Scott here?
Weiss
Thu Nov 17 2011 16:55
I was spanked as a kid, and I see know harm in it. I don't condone "beating" but a little spanking won't hurt anyone.
Julie Worley
Thu Nov 17 2011 12:43
U.S. Congress must Immediately Enact H.R. 3027 "The Ending Corporal Punishment in Schools Act", DUE TO DIE AGAIN IN U.S. HOUSE COMM. ON EDUCATION 12/8/2011, to stop Politicizing our nation's schoolchildren's human/constitutional/civil rights in taxpayer funded schools and ensure EQUAL access to safe and healthy learning environments for ALL U.S. Schoolchildren! In predominantly southern "BIBLE BELT" schools, MANDATORY REPORTERS of suspected child abuse, school teachers, coaches and administrators HIT STUDENTS K-12 with thick wooden PADDLES, SEXUAL ASSAULT when done to a non-consenting adult, to deliberately inflict PAIN AS PUNISHMENT for minor infractions, known as "Corporal Punishment", already ILLEGAL in schools in 31 U.S. States. Several "School Paddling States" have "Teacher IMMUNITY LAWS" to protect school employees from criminal/civil action when students are INJURED, leaving families no legal redress! Federal statistics indicate that beatings by school administrators are overwhelmingly administered in the Southern Bible Belt. The beatings are "founded upon the RELIGIOUS CONVICTION IT IS A SIN TO SPARE THE ROD AND SPOIL THE CHILD."

Please add your voice to support Federal Lesiglation to Abolish Corporal Punishment of ALL Students in America's Schools at donthitstudents dot com
switch
Thu Nov 17 2011 12:18
I chuckled
Tim
Thu Nov 17 2011 10:10
Judging by his picture, the author wasn't beaten enough as a child




log out