Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Talking politics in workplace is a right

Guest Columnist

Published: Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Updated: Thursday, February 2, 2012 17:02

On Sept. 17, 1787, the Constitution was created, followed by the Bill of Rights that declares our freedoms. The most practical and used right in the United States of America is freedom of speech. Does this include talking politics at work? That is a big question many people ask. My opinion is our First Amendment covers it.

It is no secret that politics is a hot topic. It's a hot topic such as religion, money or sexual preference. I don't believe, just because a subject can rub someone the wrong way, it should be banned. That goes double for politics since the subject is so beneficial in everyday life, especially with the radical changes the political landscape has gone through since the election of President Barack Obama in 2008.

Politics is a hard subject to avoid considering the nation is in an election year, particularly with the excitement for Florida's Republican primary this past Tuesday. The nation is experiencing political tension and is getting involved.

College students are a demographic known for political involvement. "More than six-in-10 college graduates (63 percent) fall into the high knowledge group…," the Pew Research Center reports.

Knowledge is power, and the more you speak the more you can learn. I am not saying you should yell your political views at the top of your lungs or into faces, forcing your ideas on other co-workers, or worse, to the customers. Your views need to respect the views of other people. That I believe is the major issue between most people. That is what separates a conversation and a debate.

One of the biggest issues that have set back the political world is not understanding others political preferences. Talking to other people with different views not only makes you know how strong you feel about your choices, but it give you the perfect chance to learn about others choices. It helps people keep current with the country, politically speaking. Human interaction can be the easiest way to do so.

A lot of customer-service related jobs or the most common ones require being face to face with other people and require a person to be talkative and capable of holding a conversation. Any server or waiter will tell you that any topic can come up in conversation, and if you don't have a response, you look like a fool. If a customer or co-worker asks you a question about politics or brings it up, what will be your response? You might say, "My company won't let me talk," but last time I checked, the U.S. was a democracy.

Companies and employers may have specific rules regarding speech in certain circumstances, but freedom of speech still exists. If it doesn't affect your job's performance or the performance of others, you shouldn't be punished. Sadly though, there are countless cases of people being terminated for speaking their minds in the workplace or on social media such as Twitter or Facebook.

Why would your political view be different than anything else we talk about? Is whether I am a Republican or a Democrat any different than whether I am a dog or cat person? If your boss is a Republican, can't you talk like a Democrat? Where is the line?

The Bill of Rights protects people from making laws that prohibit freedom of speech or press. It makes no difference if you are a donkey or an elephant, maybe neither; politics should not separate us as people. Your work environment is still your environment.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

1 comments

Anonymous
Fri Feb 3 2012 00:09
"Talking politics in workplace is a right"
This article has a number of issues:
1) The first amendment doesn't apply to company policies about workplace speech unless Congress itself is drafting the company's office polices (CONGRESS shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech). BTW, there are laws against certain types of speech/press which are deemed harmful (i.e. obscenity, libel, slander, child pornography, inciting to riot, etc.).
2) Paragraph 4. How does it support your thesis statement that political speech should be allowed in the workplace? It seems like filler meant to show that you "researched" your topic. In addition, you used college graduates as a proxy for college students and knowledge as a proxy for involvement. In research, this is known as an error in construct validity.
3) "Knowledge is power and the more you speak the more you can learn." Please don't use cliché adages as the basis for any argument. This sentence reminds me of a cheesy PSA. "Knowing is half the battle. GI JOE!"
4) "[Talking to other people] helps people keep current with the country...Human interaction can be the best way to do so." So, human interaction can be the best way to talk to other people? Or is human interaction the best way to keep current with the country? Talking to other people IS human interaction, so these sentences are redundant.
5) Check again. The U.S. isn't a democracy. It's a democratically elected republic. In addition, companies are typically also not democracies, so I don't know why you are bringing up democracy.
6) While one's own job performance and that of others may not be affected by political speech, company performance may suffer if customers are offended and take their business elsewhere. Certainly companies should sacrifice their bottom line at times (i.e. to keep from hurting somebody). However, should they really have to sacrifice their bottom line because you want to talk about for whom you voted last week?
7) "Why should your political view be different than ANYTHING ELSE WE TALK ABOUT?" This falsely implies that no other topics are considered taboo in certain situations.
8) "...whether I am a dog or a cat person?" Everybody knows dogs are the better choice =P
9) The first sentence of your last paragraph should remove the word "making" or insert the word "Congress" before it.
10) Unless you pay the company for your being there rather than them paying you, it isn't your environment; it's the company's.

Now, I'm not saying your position is wrong, but your arguments are terrible.





log out