Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Retribution should be Fast and Furious

Guest Columnist

Published: Sunday, August 21, 2011

Updated: Sunday, August 21, 2011 16:08

If any scandal can finally shake the suffocating, imperial grip the White House holds on our nation's dying hope for peace and prosperity, it must be Operation Fast and Furious. Although heavyweights in the mainstream media continue to sideline the issue, the secret gun-running scheme, which put more than 2,000 weapons into the hands of Mexican drug cartels, makes Watergate look like petty theft.

Operation Fast and Furious began in 2009 with a plan by myriad federal law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, to purposefully allow guns to be sold to known criminals so the weapons could be tracked as they reached high-level cartel members.

The program came to a sudden halt earlier this year when it was revealed in a congressional report that the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, who was murdered with some of the same guns the ATF allowed to walk across the border, was "likely a preventable tragedy," according to USA Today.

In a FOX News report, guns from Fast and Furious were said to have been linked to at least 11 other violent crimes in the United States alone. In a separate report, FOX News said two AK-47s "used in the high-profile kidnapping and murder of a Mexican lawyer" were purchased under the operation.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) have spearheaded the congressional investigation into the operation. In a July 18 letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, the congressmen charged the Department of Justice with attempting to cover up the investigation by not supplying requested information.

Congressional testimonies by ATF agents contradict claims made by President Barack Obama that neither he nor the DOJ knew of the controversial operation. Former ATF Special Agent William Newell told Congress that he communicated with Kevin O'Reilly, a staffer on Obama's National Security Council, about Operation Fast and Furious in September 2010, according to ATF's acting director, Kenneth Melson, has refused calls for his resignation, saying he will not be "the fall guy" for the program, according to the Los Angeles Times.

The entire operation reeks of illegal activity and corruption; it's no wonder Obama and Holder want to distance themselves from it. But should anyone really believe that they had no prior knowledge?

Back in 2009, Holder praised the launching of a "major new effort to break the backs of the cartels" in a speech about Project Gunrunner, which later involved Operation Fast and Furious. Also, Project Gunrunner was granted $10 million in taxpayer money under the "stimulus package" passed in 2009.

Federal agencies that are supposed to be tasked with keeping America safe got caught willingly supplying weapons to vicious drug cartels south of our border – the public should be aware and angry. The DOJ admits 1,048 guns are still on the loose with no way to track them down, according to the Washington Times. Was the operation really designed to bring down the cartels in the first place, or is there something larger at play here?

In a recent column in the Washington Times, Robert Farago suggested the operation was an opportunity for the CIA to help arm the Sinaloa cartel, which has close ties to the Mexican military and President Felipe Calderón. Farago accused the Obama administration of "fueling brutality and carnage" by choosing sides in a turf war between the rival Sinaloa and Zetas cartels.

And don't forget that these drug cartels are aided by the same megabanks that hold Obama's administration deep in their pockets. Bloomberg reported last year that Bank of America, Wachovia and Wells Fargo helped launder funds for Mexico's drug smugglers.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you


Tue Aug 23 2011 20:34
Austin- You wrote a very strong piece... better than the usual reporting on the issue. That lie is ubiquitous; but, it must be stopped lest the appropriate outrage be squelched, stunted at the outset.
Tue Aug 23 2011 20:28
"Operation Fast and Furious began in 2009 with a plan ... to purposefully allow guns to be sold to known criminals so the weapons could be tracked as they reached high-level cartel members."

The evidence does not support that contention.

Not in the least.

The evidence DOES support the truth of this:
"The DOJ admits 1,048 guns are still on the loose with no way to track them .... "

The plan for Fast and Furious was simple, and it was faithfully adhered to [with maybe one weak exception which became moot with the loss of battery power 40 hours later]:

The initial purchase was documented and often filmed, the guns were loosed to the criminals - even over prolonged objections by sellers and agents, then the managers showed their delight when guns recovered at violent crime scenes in Mexico were then traced back to the initial Point of Sale ( not to be confused with pos as it is popularly understood). If the initial premise were true, the operation would have been shuttered in shame soon after the first, second, or third gun had slipped surveillance.

There never was surveillance sufficient to "track" the route of any of those guns. Furthermore, the bosses were already known, and beyond that, we had no means to prosecute after the guns were turned loose.

The propaganda put out to the media, specifically the specious "intended to" propaganda is a lie. An outright lie.

Nobody associated with the implementation and loosing of that lie onto the simpleton media mavens, and by extension, the world... none of those perps have any business on this side of the bars, let alone positions of influence in the government!

log out