Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Union rights worth the fight

Published: Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Updated: Wednesday, March 2, 2011 14:03

It's not just our friends abroad who are suffering at the hands of their political leaders in the Middle East and Africa.

Recently, protesters have been storming the capitols in Wisconsin and Ohio to take a stand against their governors' attempts to cut collective bargaining rights for union workers.

This means state employees will lose their ability to negotiate with their employers regarding working conditions such as salary and health care. This extends to some of the most important people in our community: teachers, police officers, firefighters, etc.

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker claims the proposed bill is meant to help get rid of the state's deficit, but we don't believe that argument for a minute.

As Washington Post columnist Ezra Klein pointed out, we really can't blame the unions for deficit, not in Wisconsin or any of the other states facing similar issues.

There were no major changes in the way unions operated during the time the recession started; the cause of  our current economic state is mostly due to failure in the bank system.

The real reason behind Walker's actions is to disband unions entirely because they are one of the major supporters of Walker's political opponent: the Democrats.

Unions are one of the major financial supporters of the Democratic Party, without their funding it will be harder for the Democrats to find financial resources, but not impossible.

Blogger Andy Kroll from MotherJones.com breaks Walker's proposal down into three parts: union members' ability to negotiate conditions with their employers will be greatly reduced; they will no longer be able to collect dues, which consequently means they'll lose their ability to organize members or lobby the legislature; and each year the union members will have to vote to decide whether or not the union should continue to exist.

With their power entirely stripped, however, it's highly unlikely that members would continue to vote the union back into existence.

Proposals like this aren't just limited to Wisconsin and Ohio; Indiana, Iowa, Michigan and even Florida are currently struggling with anti-union legislation.

We value our state workers far too much to see them abused and neglected in such a way. They did not cause our current budget crisis and their sacrifices won't save us from it.

It's extremely petty that these governors would sacrifice the union rights of teachers, police officers and other public servants — who are already underpaid, overworked and often have to worry about whether or not they'll have a job next year — in a foolish attempt to eliminate the competition.

It's not just union members who are unhappy about all this. A New York Times/CBS poll found that 60 percent of Americans are against weakening bargaining rights for unions, whereas only 33 percent favor it.

The fate of these bills is uncertain. In Wisconsin all the Senate Democrats left the state, because without them the Senate does not have enough members necessary to conduct a vote.

We hope to see these bills killed in all the states currently struggling with this issue. We can only imagine the repercussions otherwise.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments

Anonymous
Sun Mar 6 2011 01:21
Someday you will be looking for a "real" job in the "real" world. Do you really believe that you and your fellow employees should be allowed to hold the employer, who is the one offering the job and providing the salary along with the benefits, hostage to your demands? In the free market, if you have a skill that is needed you get paid market price. Unions throw all this out the window and make demands regardless of skills, demands or economi times. I can understand demanding safet work conditions but compensation and benefits should be what the market can afford. However, communication can exist between employer & employee without the benefit of a union.

Government workers should not be given any special consideration because they chose that career path. In the private sector, many would be fired for their "gimme" attitude without the work behind it.

Try getting a building permit at your local CIty Hall in an hour. BNetter yet give yourself 4-5 hours while you wait for them to take all teh union-demanded breaks. Want your trash picke dup - make sure you put the trash bin in the exact space required or the "sanitation engineer" can't go outside that box to pick it up because "union rules say so". I can go on and on. As an HR Director with experince in government & private sectors, I can tell you that unions no longer have a need to exist except to provide union leaders their 6-figure salaries and unmotivated workers collect a paycheck until they retire after 20 years but continue colelcting a paycheck & benefits.

Be a real reporter & learn about your topic before you write.

PS My husband and left Ohio many years ago when I realized that the union at my company was making demands we could not afford to meet anymore. We sold teh company to another business who then relocated to Mexico.

sam
Fri Mar 4 2011 09:34
Why do you have an "Our Stance" in this newspaper. You just take the liberal side on every issue. In the interest of saving time, how about you just put down "We're democrats and we tow the party line" for every "Our Stance" column?
Anonymous
Wed Mar 2 2011 15:15
All states should be right-to-work states. These legislatures and governors should be working on getting this passed in their states. Collective bargaining is not the issue. It is forced unionism! No worker should have to join a union or pay a fee to the union as a condition of employment. This is not constitutional and it beyond me how unions can get away with this.




log out